Skip to main content
Businesses accepting stablecoin or crypto payments often start by asking how Request Network compares to the processors they already know. This page lays out the differences in fees, fund custody, dispute handling, and currency support.

How do the fees compare?

Request Network charges a small, flat protocol fee β€” a fraction of what traditional card processors like Stripe and PayPal charge, which is typically a percentage of every transaction plus a fixed per-transaction fee. For the current Request Network rate, contact the team.

What does non-custodial mean for me?

With Request Network, funds move directly from payer to recipient on-chain. There is no intermediary holding period. Traditional processors hold funds for 2-7 days before releasing them to the merchant. That hold introduces:
  • Counterparty risk β€” the processor could freeze the account or go bankrupt while holding your funds
  • Delayed access to money you’ve already been paid
  • Exposure to fund freezing or seizure
Because Request Network never takes custody of funds, none of these risks apply. The recipient has full control and immediate access as soon as the transaction settles on-chain.

What about chargebacks?

Crypto payments made through Request Network are final by default β€” there are no chargebacks. This means:
  • No reversals appearing 60-90 days after a payment was made
  • No per-dispute chargeback fees like those card processors charge
  • Fewer losses from chargeback fraud, which is a common problem for international card payments and digital goods
Card processors carry chargeback risk on every transaction: a merchant can lose the product and the payment, then pay a dispute fee on top. For businesses that still want buyer protection, Request Network supports escrow-based flows. Funds are held in a smart contract until agreed conditions are met, which enables refunds when needed without reintroducing custodial risk.

Which is better for crypto-native businesses?

Request Network is built for crypto from the ground up, rather than adding crypto support to a fiat-first system.
  • 553+ currencies supported across EVM chains (Ethereum, Polygon, BSC, and others) plus Tron
  • No forced fiat conversion β€” funds can stay in crypto end-to-end
  • Native wallet integration β€” connects directly with MetaMask, WalletConnect, and other Web3 wallets
  • Crosschain payments β€” a payer can pay in one token on one chain and the recipient receives a different token on a different chain
Traditional processors typically support a handful of assets (often just BTC, ETH, and USDC), require crypto-to-fiat conversion with variable fees, and treat crypto as an add-on to a fiat-first architecture.

How does reconciliation compare?

Both Request Network and traditional processors offer reconciliation, but the underlying guarantees differ. Because Request Network payment records live on-chain, they can’t be altered or deleted, and they don’t depend on a vendor’s continued existence to remain accessible.

Full comparison at a glance

Last modified on July 30, 2026